Exploring Tradie · one-page sheetBack-costing is reading a finished job backwards: what it cost, what it earned, where the margin came from. Do it on one job — finished, invoiced, still fresh — and the next quote gets better. That is the whole point.
Finished and invoiced in the last month. Not the biggest — the one you are curious about.
Per section: what you quoted, what it cost, what you invoiced. Labour, materials & subbies, other.
One line per section, margin in the last column. Your AI can build it from a Xero and job-software export.
Two things worth your time — not ten. Then change the next quote or the next job setup.
| Section | Quoted | Cost | Invoiced | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour | $172,000 | $131,500 | $184,200 | 28.6% |
| Materials, subbies | $398,000 | $386,900 | $419,600 | 7.8% |
| Other | $18,000 | $2,150 | $27,400 | 92% |
| Total | $588,000 | $520,550 | $631,200 | 17.5% |
Materials carry the risk and return the least at a flat markup — they came in $11,000 under the quote, so the quote was fine, the markup is the issue. The labour markup was not consistent across the phases — foundations and framing at one rate, fit-out at another, so the margin depended on which phase ran long. Two things. Next quote changed.
Export the job's costs and invoices, paste them in, and ask:
Build me a job profit table with one line per section — labour, materials and subbies, other — showing quoted, cost, invoiced and margin. Then write two things worth my time from it, in plain words. Do not give me ten.Check the key figures against Xero before you believe them.
0275 895 895